May
6
Mosaic Project Survey for Youth and Young Adults of Color
Filed Under UUA, Announcements, Requests | Leave a Comment
At last! The Mosaic Project on-line survey for UU Youth and Young Adults (ages 14-35) of Color and/or Latina/o and Hispanic descent has gone live! If you are a youth or young adult please Click here to take the Mosaic YaYA survey and let the Mosaic Project know how you feel about your experiences at the local, district, and continental level.
Click here to learn more about the Mosaic Project, including its key question:
The question in essence is: What are the ministry needs of African, Caribbean, Native/American Indian, Asian and Pacific Islander, Latina/Latino and Hispanic, Middle Eastern/Arab, Multiracial and Multiethnic and trans-racially adopted Unitarian Universalist (UU) youth and young adults? How does our Unitarian Universalist faith need to change in order to meet these needs? What structures need to be strengthened or established to support families, congregations, campus groups, districts, and continental bodies in their ministries to these youth and young adults?
This message was posted on behalf of Laura Spencer, UUA Program Associate for Racial and Ethnic Concerns, as part of the Assessment of Youth and Young Adult Ministries. Laura can be reached at lspencer at uua dot org.
If you enjoyed this post, you can subscribe to the RSS feed!
Jan
18
Notes from 16 January 2008 DRUUMM Steering Cmte Conference Call
Present: Manish Mishra, Mel Hoover, Hope Johnson, Adam Robersmith, Robette Dias (taking notes), PaKou Her from Crossroads.
Proposed Agenda
Mtg with the UUA Board on Friday
General Assembly Security Issues
Interweave Requests for Letters of Support
DRUUMM Consultancy Process
Leadership Vacancies — no Treasurer at present
DRUUMM’s participation on the UUA Diversity on Ministry Team
Board Meeting–(VP1) Danielle DiBona may not be able to attend the Board meeting on Friday because of an illness in the family. We should still ask Adam to go on his own to represent us (Adam joined the call after this discussion took place and is planning to go the meeting). Manish will talk to Adam on Thursday to prep him for the Board meeting. We’d like him to say DRUUMM desires a deeper ongoing relationship with the Board and to propose some kind of social interaction at GA with more than just two of us. Manish will also ask him to raise the financial issues around the Capital Campaign we talked talked about on the last conference call. The notes for that were sent out earlier this evening to the Steering Cmte list serve. (Sorry for getting them to you all so belatedly).
GA Security Issues–GA this year is being held inside the US port security zone in Fort Lauderdale. This means you will need to have a government issued ID in order to get in to GA. This also means any undocumented folks who are part of the UU community will not be able to get in. Some young folks may not be able to get in either. The Planning Cmte is supposed to be working on that, meeting with groups that may be impacted by this. One thing they have devised so far is to have Chaplains present at each entrance to support folks and work through problems that may arise. The Planning Cmte also will address in plenary the painful reality of the high levels of security and the current situation in our country that makes it a reality. Some folks are proposing a second GA site where ID is not required to hold non-business events and worship. Adam has sent a letter to the UUA board outlining his concerns about the security issues and saying he will not attend GA because of them. (After we had this discussion Adam and Hope joined the call, Hope asked Adam if he would mind circulating his letter among us and he has agreed to do that. I think Hope will be sending it to the Steering Cmte list) .
DRUUMM’s official position on the security at Ga is that we see it as a problem and we (DRUUMM) need to be prepared to deal with it as a problem, but that we as an organization will not boycott GA because of it. When Manish talks to Adam on Thursday he will ask him not to let the Board engage him around this issue while he is there to represent DRUUMM’s concerns. But to invite the Board to engage him separately if they are interested in doing so during a time that is not DRUUMM’s time with the Board.
If you enjoyed this post, you can subscribe to the RSS feed!